HomeNewsFox Legal Analyst Builds Case Against Russia Hoax
July 25, 2018
Fox Legal Analyst Builds Case Against Russia Hoax
By 1600 Staff
Fox legal analyst is releasing a book that gives the complete rundown of the Russia story called “The Russia Hoax” . Below is an excerpt adapted from the book about Peter Strzok and James Comey, both formerly of the FBI.
“The Russia Hoax, The Illicit Scheme To Clear Hillary Clinton & Frame Donald Trump” is a Hot Seller, already Number One! More importantly, it is a great book that everyone is talking about. It covers the Rigged Witch Hunt brilliantly. Congratulations to Gregg Jarrett!
In one of the more stunning revelations contained in the report compiled by the Justice Department’s watchdog, former FBI Director James Comey claimed he doesn’t remember the moment he decided – and put down in writing — that Hillary Clinton had committed crimes.
We know that on or about May 2, 2016, Comey composed a statement summarizing Clinton’s mishandling of classified documents, concluding that she was “grossly negligent.” Those pivotal words have a distinct legal meaning, and are drawn directly from a federal statute, 18 U.S.C. 793(f), which makes it a felony to handle classified documents in a “grossly negligent” manner.
. . .
Just as Comey, Strzok, Page and company conspired to clear Hillary Clinton, they likewise concocted their “insurance policy,” a scam investigation of then-candidate Donald Trump. The FBI had no legal basis to initiate its investigation into Trump and his campaign. Facts were invented or exaggerated. Laws were perverted or ignored. The law enforcers became the law breakers. Comey’s scheme to leak pilfered presidential memos in order to trigger the appointment of his friend, Robert Mueller, as special counsel was a devious maneuver by an unscrupulous man. Comey’s insinuation that the president obstructed justice was another canard designed to inflame the liberal media. Sure enough, they became his witting accessories.
Compare all of this – that there was never any credible evidence that Trump or his campaign collaborated with Russia to win the presidency – with the fact that there was ample evidence that Clinton had broken the law.
President Trump praised the book as brilliant, and for good reason. Jarrett’s legal reasoning lends weight to the argument that the FBI and Department of Justice totally forgave Hillary Clinton’s transgressions, and swung back to the other extreme to look for Russian ties that weren’t there with candidate Donald Trump. Jarrett’s book assembles the evidence against the partisans inside the government that have undermined the result of the 2016 election, and exposes their deeds.